Why our generals were more successful in World War II than in Korea, Vietnam or Iraq/Afghanistan
UC Berkeley Events
Why leaders watch it
Ricks on how quick relief of failing generals in WWII built accountability, contrasted with later wars.
Thomas Ricks's Nimitz Memorial Lecture at UC Berkeley asks why US generals did better in World War II than in Korea, Vietnam or Iraq and Afghanistan. A central point is the WWII practice of quickly reassigning or relieving underperforming generals.
Takeaways
- Relieve poor performers quickly to protect the mission
- Accountability for failure drives results
- Evaluate leaders on outcomes and adapt fast
Topics: Military & command leadership, Hiring & talent
Related
- Climbing Kilimanjaro in a Wheelchair: Jeff Harmon on Leadership, Courage & Kindness · Michael G Neece
- Resilience is a Choice | Jeff Harmon | TEDxHarvard Square · TEDx Talks
- Teddy Talks - Citizenship in a Republic (includes The Man in the Arena) · MedoraND
- Challenger: President Reagan's Challenger Disaster Speech - 1/28/86 · Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute
- "Why go to the moon?" - John F. Kennedy at Rice University · Rice University
- DO RIGHT - Coach Lou Holtz · Mark Robinson
- Leadership, Culture, and Ethics in Cybersecurity · Dr. Mansur Hasib - #DrCybersecurity
- AWS re:Invent 2019: Optimizing Aerospace manufacturing operations & supply chain with AWS (MFG201) · AWS Events
- General (Retd) Stanley McChrystal: The ‘Full Spectrum’ Team of Teams · RUSI
- Walt Disney's E.P.C.O.T. Film (1966) · The Original EPCOT
- Can America Innovate Faster Than China? Steve Blank & Pete Newell on the Future of Defense · The Cipher Brief
- Solitude and Leadership (William Deresiewicz, West Point 2009) | Art of Manliness Podcast #333 · Art of Manliness
