Munk Debate on Artificial Intelligence | Bengio & Tegmark vs. Mitchell & LeCun
Policy-Relevant Science & Technology
Why leaders watch it
Hear leading researchers debate AI risk directly, to calibrate your own stance on policy and oversight.
A Munk Debate on whether AI research and development poses an existential threat, with Yoshua Bengio and Max Tegmark against Melanie Mitchell and Yann LeCun. It presents the strongest arguments on both sides.
Takeaways
- Experts disagree sharply on the scale of AI risk
- Both sides support some form of governance
- Evaluate risk claims on evidence, not hype
Topics: AI ethics, risk & governance
Related
- Days to Seconds: Harnessing Confidential AI Agents with Kellie Romack · Opaque Systems, Inc.
- Leadership, Culture, and Ethics in Cybersecurity · Dr. Mansur Hasib - #DrCybersecurity
- Extended interview: Dario Amodei · CBS Sunday Morning
- Full interview: "Godfather of artificial intelligence" talks impact and potential of AI · CBS Mornings
- Teddy Talks - Citizenship in a Republic (includes The Man in the Arena) · MedoraND
- The Catastrophic Risks of AI — and a Safer Path | Yoshua Bengio | TED · TED
- Kellie Romack on how ServiceNow Generated $355M in AI Value | Technovation 1062 · Metis Strategy
- Economist: The AI Risk Almost Nobody Is Talking About | Erik Brynjolfsson · This Is The World
- How Agentic AI Changes The Workplace — With Jacqui Canney and Kellie Romack · Alex Kantrowitz
- The Quest for Ethical Artificial Intelligence | Timnit Gebru || Harvard Radcliffe Institute · Harvard Radcliffe Institute
- Kellie Romack on ServiceNow's $355M AI Transformation | From 4 Days to 8 Seconds · CAIO AI Leadership Podcast
- "Deep Unlearning": Timnit Gebru on AI Hype, Ethics & Algorithmic Racial Bias · Democracy Now!